The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
The bar chart gives information about the results of three team in each season from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, team B was always the best team in terms of the score in four seasons. The rest of the teams didn’t have any significant difference over the four- seasons period.
In 2002, team A reached the peak at 82pt, the biggest number in comparison with the remainder of the teams, at precisely 5pt with team A and 10pt with team C. During the season in 2003 and 2004, the achievement of team A disappeared when the number decreased sharply to 43pt in 2004 while both of team A and team C had improvement when their score rose continually, especially team A, this team totalled 35pt in 2004. But during the remainder of the period, there was a dramatic growth with team B to 55pt. By contrast, team A witnessed a rapid reduction to 8pt. The number with team C also wasn’t good, their score was just 5pt in 2004.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 78
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 77
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- IELTS writing task 1The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5119047619 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52580222321 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1264059143 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336561037046 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152703528982 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857641441997 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244932068969 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108955159262 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.