The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates that the points obtained by three teams per different seasons between 2002 and 2005. Overall, the Team B had always the highest scores, whereas two other teams had relatively fewer points during the same periods.
The teams other than the Team B accounted for tiny volume of points in 2002, which demonstrates that they had only 5pt and 10pt each, however, 82pt were given to the Team B. Same trend was continued in the next year, it can be seen that the second and third teams succeeded more twice that of the previous year, which the Team A accounted for 11pt while the Team C occupied 15pt. In contrast, the Team B declined more than 20pt but still had far the most points in 2003.
The Team A and B in 2004 were at very similar level of scores, 35pt and 43pt, respectively. The Team C had the lowest points of 12pt in the same year. Again, the trend fluctuated in 2005, the Team B increased by 12pt but the Team A showed big disappointment with score of 8pt and another team with 5pt.
Consequently, one team with the most volume of scores declined and others slightly increased through 2002 and 2004, however, it again fluctuated into opposite trend in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | jin96 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | farheenNaheed | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | farheenNaheed | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | farheenNaheed | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-13 | HuyenB1 | 56 | view |
- There is growing evidence that man made activities are making global temperatures higher What might be the man made causes of temperatures rising How should we deal with this problem 89
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Examine the arguments in favour of and against animal experiments, and come to a conclusion on this issue.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.Write at least 250 words. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, second, so, still, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61860465116 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36609364453 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3025494609 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14349075574 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713056463918 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388223938951 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969937610503 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301408681946 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.