The bar graph illustrates the levels of participation in education and science in development and industrialized countries furthermore, it shows spending on research and development in 1980 and 1990.
According to the first bar graph, the average years of schooling in developing countries was only about 2 on the contrary, Industrilized countries were at 8 in 1980. Afte a decade, the numbers increased for both the developing and industrialised countries, 3 years in developing countries, while over 10 years in developed countries.
In the second graph, the number of Scientist and Technician was much higher in developed countries than the developing countries. The percentage of Scientist and Technician in developing countries both in 1980 and 1990 was below 20 while this was around 50 on an average in developed countries.
Finally, the third graph represents that the amount spent on Research and Development in industrially developed countries was much higher than the spending in developing countries. In 1980 the spending was around 50 billion US dollar in developing countries while this amount was more than 150 billion US dollar in developed countries. Interestingly, after 10 years the spending in Research & Development in developed countries was doubled while that amount decreased almost by 50% in developing countries.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000 87
- Some people belive that comanies should manufacture products that last for a long time Other feel that the emphasis shoul be laced on producing goods that are cheap Discus both views and give your own opinion 61
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999 89
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, second, third, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55825242718 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25213717145 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436893203883 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.7749833555 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 143.125 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31814214792 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186367601374 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130557479361 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264130493396 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149484366386 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.