The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the data of consumption of fuel in the USA between 1980 to 2030.
At the start of the period, people consumed Petrol/Oil, Coal and Natural Gases, 35, 16 and 15 quadrillion per unit, respectively. Other energy sources like, Nuclear, solar and hydropower was reported 4 quadrillion units.
In 1990, nuclear consumption was reported at 4 quadrillion units and slightly increased by 7 quadrillion units in 2030. Followed by, solar energy, with significant fluctuations reached at 5 quadrillion units. In contrast, hydropower energy, with slight fluctuations, remained at the same number by the year of 2030.
However, biggest change was seen in petrol and oil consumption. In 1980, it is reported 35 quadrillion unit and it kept increasing over the years, finishing at the highest level of all the power sources, around 45 quadrillion units.
Natural gases and Coal reported the second and third highest consumption units in the USA in 1980, by 20 and 15 quadrillion unit, respectively. Despite, the second highest unit, natural gases consumption experienced dropping in the number of fuel consumption, in 2030. On the other hand, with the gradual increase in the number, Coal became the second highest energy for consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Toghrul Azizli | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | harshnadhingra | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the US from 1850 to 2000 87
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
- Some people belive that comanies should manufacture products that last for a long time Other feel that the emphasis shoul be laced on producing goods that are cheap Discus both views and give your own opinion 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- THE GRAPH SHOWS THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN THE US AND JAPAN BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND MARCH 1999 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the biggest'.
Suggestion: , the biggest
...e number by the year of 2030. However, biggest change was seen in petrol and oil consu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34170854271 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04275402585 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517587939698 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8309536932 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6363636364 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141884546047 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066612676024 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490432721998 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095985756395 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442575965047 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.