The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates, the information of teaching hours of each teacher in three different category of school such as primary, lower secondary, and upper secondary in Japan, Iceland, Spain and USA in 2001. Units are measured in hours.
Overall, upper secondary teachers was the highest position of teaching hours in over the four countries and least amount of hours used by primary school teachers. Teachers from USA has used considerably huge amount of time for teaching among other countries over the given period.
Primary school teachers spent relatively same amount of time for teaching in Japan, Spain and Iceland such as, approximately, 600, 650 and 590 respectively. Whereas, USA spent more than 700 hours for primary students. Similarly, lower secondary teachers spent more than 600 hours for teaching in all the given countries, and instead USA makes up teaching hours with 1000 hours.
Regarding Spain and Iceland teachers use their time for teaching in upper secondary division with 900 hours in 2001. While, Japan and USA use their number of hours with 700 and near 1200 hours respectively. Moreover, Japan account for relatively lower amount of teaching hours in three division compared to other countries in 2001.
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 73
- Some feel that movies and tv shows are a good way to study history despite their lack of historical accuracy at times To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that air travels should be allowed to grow without limits. Others think that the government should limit air travels. Discuss both views & give your opinion. 89
- Nowadays more and more people want to live by themselves. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative trend? 11
- Some people say that no one should work after the age of 65 others say that anyone should be able to continue working for as long as they wish Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'category' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'categories'.
Suggestion: categories
...ours of each teacher in three different category of school such as primary, lower second...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Japan) must be used with a third-person verb: 'accounts'.
Suggestion: accounts
...200 hours respectively. Moreover, Japan account for relatively lower amount of teaching...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, second, similarly, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57382082068 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474747474747 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.698027575 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249657228996 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110950573623 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645382706859 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172840630972 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345842858739 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.