The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003

Essay topics:

The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.

The given pie charts illustrate, the percentage of energy coming from six various resources in a country in two different years such as 1985 and 2003. Measured percentage of resources are oil, natural gas, nuclear, coal, hydro and other renewable sources.

Overall, oil was the overwhelming majority of energy producers in both years with 52% and 39% respectively. Likewise, hydro power produce only 4 % energy in given years. Other renewable energy has a mild increase in production from 1985 to 2003 such as, 1% to 4%.

Regarding to the nuclear power was a significant decline in production from 22% to 8 % when it comes from 1985 to 2003. Meanwhile, coal energy production generated from 8 % to 22% with rapid increase when years gone. Natural gas production has rise up to 10% as compared to the year of 1985. in 1985 natural gas producing energy was mere 13%, while in 2003 which was 23% of total energy production.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-18 chuc linh 73 view
2023-02-18 chuc linh 78 view
2023-02-18 chuc linh 78 view
2022-10-06 celine ayoub 73 view
2022-05-24 vialia view
Essays by user eyraen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...to 10% as compared to the year of 1985. in 1985 natural gas producing energy was m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, regarding, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88535031847 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71626323052 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0667795216 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.2222222222 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331435078041 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142778352029 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941262073411 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238439366469 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319543160997 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.