The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
The bar chart demonstrates how many hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in 4 different nations in 2001.
The teaching hours at secondary level were higher than those at primary level in general. In the USA, it was found that tutors spent their time teaching more than in 3 other countries.
An American educator devoted more than 700 hours teaching primary students while a Japanese tutor worked 600 hours teaching the same grade in 2001. Additionally, Iceland teachers spent about 590 hours less educating primary pupils than Japanese teachers, and Spanish educators spent 100 hours less than US teachers.
Both Spain and Iceland showed us a number of 900 working hours from upper secondary educators. Japan had 200 more hours than Spain and Iceland and USA had the highest figure in 4 countries, nearly 1100 hours.
At the lower secondary level, the time tutors in Iceland spent teaching was 600 hours, whereas US educators taught elementary and secondary students for 1000 hours. In Spain, lower secondary tutors taught for around 650 hours, 100 hours longer than Japanese educators.
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- You work in a busy but poorly organised office and you are keen to be promoted Your employer needs to find a new supervisor for your department Write a letter to your employer In the letter ask to be considered for this job explain why you would be a suit 84
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 61
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17777777778 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4005914909 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8871794366 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.555555556 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203792767795 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104718132539 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115927118709 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149764934301 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139478549225 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.