The bar charts illustrates the amount of electricity produced and utilized by ten different countrie in 2014.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrates the quantity of electricity produced and utilized by ten different countries in 2014.
Overall, China and United States manufactured significantly higher volume of electricity than any other countries on the list which is approximately four times higher than that by the third country of the list. Almost for all of the countries in the list, the amount of electricity created is higher than consumed, but Germany is the only country that used more electricity than its production.
China clinched the top position with 5398 billion kWh of electricity, meanwhile they processed 5,322 billion kWh. Meanwhile United states falls short from china by around 300 billion kWh of electricity which secured them the second position.
There is a substantial difference between the top two and bottom eight countries in the chart which is around 3000 kWh between United states at position two and Russia at position three. In addition to that, bottom four countries produced around 564.2 billion kWh of electricity and consumed about 450 billion kWh of it where Korea, Rep positioned at the bottom of the chart with 485.1 kWh.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'illustrate'.
Suggestion: illustrate
The bar charts illustrates the quantity of electricity produced an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e third country of the list. Almost for all of the countries in the list, the amount of el...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...while they processed 5,322 billion kWh. Meanwhile United states falls short from china by...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26486486486 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73693990238 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4014241141 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.333333333 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8333333333 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198297060048 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146834813215 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167166014582 0.0843802449381 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185133172344 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192798009598 0.0819641961636 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.