The given first pie chart gives information about typical Australian household energy usages while the second pie chart presents the rate of greenhouse gas emissions caused by Australian household, which lead to environmental problems.
The charts illustrate the amount of energy used by a regular Australian resident based on six different systems(heating, cooling, lighting, other appliances, refrigeration, water heating) and the volume green house gas released into atmosphere from those sources. The unit of measurement used here is in percentage.
Overall, heating and water heating clinched the top spot in the energy utilization sector. Although, water heating retained its first position in green house gas emission sector but other appliances topped the heating sector and established itself in second position for the emission chart. Cooling remained at the bottom for both of the pie charts.
Heating, water heating and other appliances positioned top of the charts for both cases. Although, there is a significant decline in amount of emission of green house gas by heating which is at 15% in emission chart compared to 42% in utilization chart. On The contrary, a substantial increase is seen in the sector of other appliance for the second chart, where the percentage reached to a staggering 28% in comparison with 15% from the first chart.
In cooling, lighting and refrigeration sector the changes are minimal. For instance, cooling increased by 1% from 2% in chart 1 to a 3% in chart 2. Whereas, lighting doubled to 8% from its initial value at 4%. Similarly, refrigeration has also doubled its value to 14%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ioned top of the charts for both cases. Although, there is a significant decline in amou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... from 2% in chart 1 to a 3% in chart 2. Whereas, lighting doubled to 8% from its initia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23555555556 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92237008498 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515555555556 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.0850672974 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180441741764 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654899287201 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589010877555 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110395621324 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445817879257 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.