Bar graph
The bar graph illustrates the information about different countries spent money on different types of entertainment in between 1995 and 2000. The graph shows about Asia, Europe and United States spent money on cinema, video, music, publishing, television.
Firstly, Asia spent less amount of money on television whereas, highest amount of money spent by USA in both years. For publishing, Asia and Europe spent same money and gradual increased can be seen for both years while, United States spent 100 to 120 amount of money in both years. Asia and Europe spent money on television in between 0 to 50 but America spent 50 to 100 on television.
Secondly, 10 money spent by Asia on music in 1995 while, in 2000, Asia spent double money. Other states except Asia spent approximately same money on this mode of entertainment. Furthermore, European spent less than 5 money on video and cinema in both years. Moreover nearly same money spent by Asia and USA on those entertainments.
Overall, Asia and Europe public are less interested in all kind of entertainment, as USA people are interested.
- The rise of convenience foods has helped people keep up with the speed of modern lifestyle What are the advantages of this trend Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 73
- Information Table
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world Why is this What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy 89
- Pie Charts 67
- Some people think that the use of animals for experiment is cruel other think it as good for development of science Discuss both the views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the highest'.
Suggestion: , the highest
...ss amount of money on television whereas, highest amount of money spent by USA in both ye...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'amount' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'amounts'.
Suggestion: amounts
...s while, United States spent 100 to 120 amount of money in both years. Asia and Europe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...oney on video and cinema in both years. Moreover nearly same money spent by Asia and USA...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02197802198 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.777373342 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483516483516 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1617377942 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0621631171708 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363697326578 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791209378609 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0624301114184 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108132124899 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.