bar graph
The bar graph illustrates the information about divorce rates in two European countries namely Finland and Sweden for every year from 2011 to 2015.
Firstly, the percentage for divorce in Finland was nearly 37% in 2011 while; sudden fall in percentage can be seen for next year and reached to approximately 30%. Furthermore, in 2013, this rate again increased to 39% which was approximately similar to 2011. However, divorce ratio stayed same for next two year, 2014 and 2015 but slight went up with compared to 2013. The percentage for both year 2014 and 2015 was more than 40%.
Secondly, in Sweden, the divorce rate was more than 40% in 2011 while, this rate dramatically increased to nearly 50% in 2012. In contrast, the divorce ratio had been gone down within next three year and reached to approximately 45%, 43% and 38% in 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively. As per graph, sudden fall in rate can be seen in 2015.
Overall, in Finland, divorce rate had been increased with some fluctuation whilst, decreased in Sweden. However, the divorce rate is more in Sweden among all year except 2015.
- Line graph 11
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 88
- Bar graph and line diagram 73
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important 56
- Nowadays some older people choose to live in retirement communities with other people rather than living with their adult children Is it a positive or negative development 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84574468085 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55418309645 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9568667503 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727417698875 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037851775171 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786672545743 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731132364797 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973312885682 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.