The bar graph represent the information regarding the production of carbon emission in different six countries for a three decades. The calibration is given in thousands in metric tonnes .
Overall, according to graph, it is clear that in the regards of 2005, increasing trend was observed in all countries accept to Germany in the production of carbon emission.
As regards carbon emission, USA witnessed the highest rate in all given 3 years which was 12 thousands metric tonnes . By contrast, Canada had only below than 2 thousands metric tonnes per year which was noticed the least production of carbon emission. Initiating at 1800,000 in 1975 and decreased to 1500,000 in 1995 , the rate of carbon emission in United Kingdom increased by 1300,000 in 2005.
Although India had only 500,000 carbon emission in 1975, the rate production was increased by 250,000 in 2005. In 2005, Considering to China had displayed incling trend in the given period, the productivity swelled 5 times that of 1975 at 1500,000 and 300,000 respectively.
In conclusion, USA produced the highest carbon emission which was followed by China in given time period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...n is given in thousands in metric tonnes . Overall, according to graph, it is c...
^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is clear that in the regards of 2005, increasing trend was observed in all cou...
^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ars which was 12 thousands metric tonnes . By contrast, Canada had only below than...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... carbon emission. Initiating at 1800,000 in 1975 and decreased to 1500,000 in 19...
^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bon emission. Initiating at 1800,000 in 1975 and decreased to 1500,000 in 1995 ,...
^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 1975 and decreased to 1500,000 in 1995 , the rate of carbon emission in United K...
^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, the productivity swelled 5 times that of 1975 at 1500,000 and 300,000 respect...
^^
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctivity swelled 5 times that of 1975 at 1500,000 and 300,000 respectively. In...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, well, as regards, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22702702703 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8098954919 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9121539335 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14616660656 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07639424044 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919234687995 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103879345757 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083317823656 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.