The bar graph illustrates the proportion of Americans ate in fast food establishments over a period of ten years from 2003 to 2013.
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of Americans ate in fast food establishments over a period of ten years from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, It is clear that the proportion of Americans ate in fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2006 experienced an upward trend, while there was a downward trend in the figure for people ate in these restaurants in the USA between 2006 and 2013. We can also see the majority of the eating at fast food established of Americans were once a week or once or twice a month in all three years.
In three years, more than a quarter of Americans ate in fast food outlets once and four a month. About 10 to 20% of Americans ate in these outlets several times a week and a few times a year, while 3 to 4% of people ate in these outlets daily, and less than 5% of people avoided fast food outlets.
Over ten years, the proportion of people ate fast food outlets once and several times a week, and a few times a year rose by approximately 3%. In contrast, this figure for people ate once or twice a month decreased by 5% from 30% to 25%.
- The bar chart illustrates the frequency with which Americans ate in fast food establishments from 2003 to 2013 58
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars Why is this the case Which development do you think is better 75
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 61
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should beoffered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary educationto those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.29702970297 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49216004306 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460396039604 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0697801932 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489433029551 0.215688989381 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.283504794924 0.103423049105 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.297738875052 0.0843802449381 353% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.418876654389 0.15604864568 268% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.336555652449 0.0819641961636 411% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.