The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
Statistical data on the international sales of various kinds of digital games over a course of seven years, starting from 2000 is illustrated in the given bar graph.
As can be observed explicitly from the chart, most global sales of digital games experienced an upward trend over the period shown. Most significantly, the figure for handheld games in sales were the most popular games of all types.
In 2000, while handheld games stood at nearly 12 billion dollars in global sales, console games reached more than half of 6 billion dollars, compared to handheld games. During the period, handheld games increased dramatically and reached a record high of about 18 billion dollars whereas console games decreased considerably by half comprising the first time.
Online games and mobile phone games respectively started in the market in 2001 and 2002 with the figure instituting almost 1 billion and 2 billion dollars after which point both games went up noticeably and were recorded over 8 billion and 6 billion dollars in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 84
- The tables show the average salaries of graduates and non graduates in the UK in 2010 73
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14201183432 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63246451112 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.746175382 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368067478007 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177292770234 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517861310753 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210788164157 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277291737646 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.