the bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006
The bar chart compares the worldwide revenue of different kinds of digital games measured in billions of dollars from 2000 to 2006
Overall, there were many increases reported in all 4 types of game with the dominance of handheld games. Remarkably, online games and mobile phone games did not appear until 2001 and 2002 respectively
In 2000, handheld game and console game were the only two sorts of digital game. While there was about 6$ billion from the sale profit of console games, the figure for handheld version was doubled that, with approximately $12 billion. Not until 2001 was online games established as well as mobile phone games which was made not ealier than 2002, which were evenly sold at 1$ billion in their beginning years
However, by 2006 there were many significant growths in the sale profit of online and mobile phone games with the increases of 5$ billion and 7$ billion respectively, higher than the figure for console games which steadily dropped throughout the period. Finally, handheld game was still seen as the most-played type of game when it nearly brought 18$ billion to their enterprises
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- The graphs below show the post school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 54
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$6'.
Suggestion: $6
... of digital game. While there was about 6$ billion from the sale profit of console...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1'.
Suggestion: $1
...er than 2002, which were evenly sold at 1$ billion in their beginning years How...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$5'.
Suggestion: $5
...obile phone games with the increases of 5$ billion and 7$ billion respectively, hi...
^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$7'.
Suggestion: $7
...es with the increases of 5$ billion and 7$ billion respectively, higher than the f...
^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$18'.
Suggestion: $18
...yed type of game when it nearly brought 18$ billion to their enterprises
^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...brought 18$ billion to their enterprises
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05319148936 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43584500291 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 108.972657121 43.030603864 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 190.0 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.6 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304564344599 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182333393474 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844738318982 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222333640573 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100305484009 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.2329268293 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.