The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days.
The bar illustrates the percentage of cinema goers in a country in Europe on seven days a week from 2003 to 2007.
Overall, the number of people who went to the cinemas in 2003, 2005 and 2007 fluctuated over the period. Cinemas were crowded with people on weekends, while there was a smaller figure on weekdays. Especially from Monday to Thursday, the percentage of people attending to the movie theaters varied in 2003, 2005 and 2007.
Meanwhile, the three-year average leveled off on Friday at 30%. Besides, cinema goers in 2003 experienced sharp growth up to approximately 40% on Saturday and dropped again to nearly 30% on Sunday.
The number of people in 2005 went up and down from Monday to Thursday and started to rise to 45% on Saturday and declined to roughly 35% on Sunday. People going to cinemas fluctuated between Monday and Thursday in 2007, but increased significantly on Friday and Saturday. After that, it continued to decrease by over 30% on Sunday.
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that government should have the responsibility To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- The sports center that you regularly visit has a problem with some of its equipment Write a letter to the center manager In your letter tell them about the problem describe how it has affected you explain why it should be fixed soon 84
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89759036145 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67511258061 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1942118217 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206800866736 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874216526539 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793474297037 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136853432188 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863465734864 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.