The bar shows the precentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days

Essay topics:

The bar shows the precentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days.

The bar chart illustrates the proportion of citizens going to cinemas in one European country over the period shown.
As can be seen from the chart, it was clear that whereas the figures for inhabitants going to movies on Monday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday witnessed an upward trend, this opposite was true for Tuesday and Wednesday. The percentage of people going to cinemas on Friday maintained the same level. Going to movies on Saturday accounted for the greatest percentage over the time frame.
In 2003, the proportion of inhabitants going to cinemas on Saturday was highest, standing at exactly 40, compared to precisely 30 on Friday and Sunday. The figure for people going to movies on Tuesday doubled on Monday, registering exactly 20 and 10 respectively. The percentage of city-dweller going t cinemas on Thursday was about 2 higher than on Wednesday, making up around 18 and 16 correspondingly.
By 2007, there was a slight increase in the proportion of inhabitants going to cinemas on weekends, at approximately 42 on Saturday and 32 on Sunday in 2007. A similar trend could be seen in the figure for Monday and Thursday, accounting for by about 3. The percentage of people going to movies on Tuesday and Wednesday decreased slowly to roughly 18 and under 10 respectively in 2007, and on Friday leveled out to precisely 30 by 2007.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-18 TLan168 view
2023-03-18 TLan168 78 view
2023-03-18 TLan168 67 view
2023-03-18 TLan168 view
2022-08-12 doquytuan 67 view
Essays by user doquytuan :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
well, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95594713656 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92232232738 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493392070485 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4551528086 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200350704884 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100908495573 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923314576041 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166003725846 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101133061603 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
well, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95594713656 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92232232738 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493392070485 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4551528086 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200350704884 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100908495573 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923314576041 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166003725846 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101133061603 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.