The bart chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States (1999)

Essay topics:

The bart chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States (1999)

The graph illustrates the number of workers in 1999 from the European Union in the United States.

Looking to the bar chart we can see that in 1990 United States had a Union with many countries firstly,with French from that country United States had only 5.000 employees.However there were alot of British and German workers. From German 25.000 workers and from Britain approximatelly 30.000 employees worked in the United States. Furthermore in the US were employees from other different countries and overall they had 20.000 workers from disparate countries. And one more last workers from Italy . They had avarage number of employees from Italy approximatelly 8.000 employees were working in the United States.

All in all the number of workers who were working in 1999 in the United States had different quantity .However British and Germans had more employees than other countries.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-08 Heyps 78 view
2020-01-08 Heyps 78 view
2020-01-08 Heyps 56 view
2020-01-08 PennybooomC4 56 view
2020-01-08 Shakhzod Yodgorov 56 view
Essays by user PennybooomC4 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the bar chart we can see that in 1990 United States had a Union with many coun...
^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , with
... had a Union with many countries firstly,with French from that country United States ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... United States had only 5.000 employees.However there were alot of British and German ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... United States had only 5.000 employees.However there were alot of British and German ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s had only 5.000 employees.However there were alot of British and German workers....
^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... employees worked in the United States. Furthermore in the US were employees from other dif...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l they had 20.000 workers from disparate countries. And one more last workers fro...
^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...es. And one more last workers from Italy . They had avarage number of employees fr...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the United States had different quantity .However British and Germans had more emp...
^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...e United States had different quantity .However British and Germans had more employees ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e United States had different quantity .However British and Germans had more employees ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2676056338 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74040232091 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 70.0 106.607317073 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6556467971 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.857142857 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336148111334 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186464077955 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932594311884 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27171076142 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866100991893 0.0819641961636 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.