Below is a chart showing how many hours per week the average person spent on various kinds of media, including watching TV, surfing on the Internet, listening to the radio, and reading printed material. The years covered are from 1990 to 2005.
The chart below shows the amount of time people spent on the social media such as watching TV, surfing on the Internet, listening to the radio, and reading printed material from 1990 to 2005.
The hours people spent for watching TV are the highest comparing to others 3 categories. The amount of time stayed constantly 30 hours per weak from 1990 to 1995. Afterward, it rapidly drop to 17 hours for 10 years since 1995. Another decreasing subject is printed material and in felt gradually from 7 hours to 3 hours for 15 years which was more than a half the amount. For the radio, people used it more from 1990 to 2005. However, it just a small 1 hour increased from 4 hours. Last thing is surfing the Internet which held a significantly risen from non to 14 hour in just 15 years since 1990. The key finding from the chart is with the invention of Internet, television and printed media were replaced by its.
Overall, the dominant of television are replaced by Internet which from 30 hours and non to 17 hours and 14 hours. The printed media also saw the
slightly decreased opposite to radio
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-29 | AnhNguyen752002 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-28 | Hoang Minh | 73 | view |
- Below is a chart showing how many hours per week the average person spent on various kinds of media including watching TV surfing on the Internet listening to the radio and reading printed material The years covered are from 1990 to 2005 73
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 73
- In many countries people are spending more hours at their workplace Why is that Is that negative and positive development 80
- The diagrams below show how a hybrid car works and how it is environmentally friendly 86
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ghest comparing to others 3 categories. The amount of time stayed constantly 30 hou...
^^^
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drops'?
Suggestion: drops
...rom 1990 to 1995. Afterward, it rapidly drop to 17 hours for 10 years since 1995. An...
^^^^
Line 2, column 565, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...ld a significantly risen from non to 14 hour in just 15 years since 1990. The key fi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...14 hours. The printed media also saw the slightly decreased opposite to radio
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5404040404 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3778011636 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7595245676 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7272727273 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402998455941 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159545347844 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116023741205 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251881762204 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174695119617 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.