The car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2005.
The table compares the number of car uses in three countries, namely Agrentina, Australia, Thailand between 2003 and 2009.
Overall, it is clear that the quantity of car uses in Thailand is highest than Argentina and Australia. In addition, Australia followed an upward trend throughout the whole period surveyed, a reserve pattern can be seen to Argentina.
In the first year, Argentina produced 400,000 cars, as twice much as the number of car uses in Australia. Thailand manufactured 700,000 car uses. A double fall of car uses was seen in Argentina from 2003 to 2005. By contrast, the number of car uses witnessed a double growth in Australia, with 400,000. The figure for cars uses rose sharply to 1,119,000 cars in Thailand in 2005.
In the final year, a moderate decrease was seen in the number of car uses in Argentina and Thailand, which reached at 161,000 and 999,000 cars, respectively. There is a substantial increase in the number of car uses in Australia, with 600,000 cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the changes to an art gallery floor plan in 2005 and the present day
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 56
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 72
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 56
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. (pound sterling) 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs, respectively. There is a substantial increase in the number of car uses in Au...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97604790419 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72322794755 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532934131737 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9532470963 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328368557322 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16652549134 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116899543968 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204478404914 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107472314455 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.