car uses of three countries from 2003 to 2009
The table provides a comparison of the number of cars used in three different nations between 2003 and 2009.
Overall, people in Thailand used much more cars than those in Australia and Argentina during the period shown. It is also evident that Argentina is the only country that saw a decrease in car uses, while the figure for two other countries experienced an upward trend.
As can be seen from the table, in 2003, there were 400,000 cars used in Argentina, twofold of Australia’s figure, at 200,000 cars. Meanwhile, the number of cars in Thailand stood at 700,000, significantly higher than those in other countries.
Thailand witnessed a peak of 1,119,000 cars used in 2005, but finally declined gradually to 999,000 in 2005. In contrast, there was a fall by half to 200,000 cars in the number car use in Argentina in the year of 2005, it then went down steadily to 161,000 cars by 2009. Over the period, the figure for Australia witnessed a consistent increase and reached the figure of 600,000 in the year of 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-28 | ledinhphong | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | phungnguyen1611 | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | Dung nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | Dung nguyen | 79 | view |
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
- The news media have too much influence on people s lives today and this is a negative development To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Advertising industry has a huge influence on society Do you think the positive effects of advertising outweigh negative effects 78
- When choosing a job salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- When choosing a job salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8202247191 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57702942778 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.2777587519 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367494133317 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159634831402 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103634822053 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233713028045 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874791504866 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.