Chart
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of using water for specific aims in the world's six parts.
It is clear that the main reason for using water is agricultural. But there are exceptional cases in North America and Europe, these areas of the world use water for this purpose just 39% in North America and 32% in Europe. Central Asia is the first area in the world that exploiting water for agricultural, this area uses 88% of water for this aim.
It is a quite different situation in using water for industrial purposes among six parts of the world. It is important to notice that North America and Europe which using water for agricultural purposes less than other parts of the world, these areas use water for industrial more than those parts of the world. The percentage of using water for Industrial in North America is 48% and in Europe is 53%. These percentages outweigh the percentage of using water for this aim in other parts of the world where the biggest percentage is 12% in South East Asia.
The percentages of using water for domestic goals are approximately equal in the six parts of the world. It is changing from 7% in Central and South East Asia to 19% in South America.
- Chart 11
- The graph below shows average car carbon dioxide (CO2) per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own know 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65258215962 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46633977578 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427230046948 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1582312545 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0274775823687 0.215688989381 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0209755396278 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629266188835 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524388490696 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908267508789 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.