The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan.
The bar chart represents the total number of Japan’s inhabitants from 1950 until now, and projections until 2055, whereas the table illustrates the proportion of people older than 65 within the population in the same period.
Upon analysis of the chart and the table, it is clear that the percentage of elderly people in Japan has increased throughout the period. Moreover, although Japan’s population has risen from 1950 to 2015, it is expected to drop sharply in the next 40 years.
For Japan’s population figures, the period between 1950 and 2005 saw tremendous growth, from 84.1 million people to 127.8 million. The ten years afterwards witnessed a slight decrease in the number of people residing in Japan to just 125.4 million. However, this decrease is expected to sharpen in the next 40 years, with a measly 89.9 million being the figure forecast for 2055.
Regarding the percentage of over-65s within Japan’s populace, in 1950, only one in twenty Japanese were older than 65, but in just 55 years, this ratio has risen to one in five. By 2055, 41 percent of all Japanese people are expected to have surpassed the age of 65. Related to this dramatic rise is a rise in the number of people older than 65, from 4.1 million in 1950, to 25.7 million in 2005, and a forecasted nine-fold increase of 36.5 million in 2055.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- “We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with 80
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, regarding, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94759825328 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63851597621 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519650655022 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1393296548 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.888888889 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131103586464 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619843032515 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469860090479 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100428702717 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522657580511 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.