The chart and the table illustrate the Japanese population data over a one-hundred-year period.
Overall, according to the chart, the number of Japanese residents increases steadily in the past and the present but decreases in the future. At the same time, the table shows that the older population is growing and contributing more and more to the total population.
At the first glance at the chart, in 1950, the Japanese population was 84,1, these figures kept rising stably until reached the peak at 127,8 in 2005. In the last 45 years, the figures dropped slightly to 125,4 in 2015 and forecasted to experience a great decrease to 89,9 in 2055.
Coming to the table's data, in 1950, the number of the older residents was 4,1 million which accounted for 4,9 per cent of the total. In the 55 following years, the number surged to 25,7 million accounted for 20%. Then, the figures are expected to continue leaping to 37,2 and 36,5 which accounts for 34% and 41% of the Japanese population.
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 73
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 10
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment What factors may have caused this situation and what in your opinion can should be done about it 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tables'' or 'table's'?
Suggestion: tables'; table's
...ecrease to 89,9 in 2055. Coming to the tables data, in 1950, the number of the older ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80701754386 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60690184154 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549707602339 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.1299429507 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.75 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103175202795 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453850145353 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316641626769 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705371017307 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287447180657 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.