The pie charts depict the electricity generated by different sources in 4 different countries namely India, Sweden, Morocco and Vietnam in 2003.
It is clearly observable that the method of producing electricity by fossil fuels was the most widely used in India and Vietnam. Additionally the other two countries, Sweden and Morocco mainly depended on Hydro power for generating electricity.
In specificity to production of electricity in India, the country largely depended on fossil fuels for electricity in 2003 with the percentage of production being 82. The other methods of hydro power and nuclear power only comprise of 14 and 4 percent respectively. This shows that nuclear power is the least popular means of producing electricity in India.
The chart for Sweden shows a quite different trend wherein the most popular method of electricity generation was Hydro power with a total of 52 percent of the electricity generated. Nuclear power comprised of the other 44 percent leaving fossil fuels as the least employed method for electricity production with merely 4 percent representation.
Quite different from the previously described countries, Vietnam and Morocco did not employ the nuclear power method at all in 2003 for electricity generation. Furthermore, it is clear that Morocco mainly relied on Hydro power for electricity since it makes 95 percent of the total electricity produced. The other 5 percent was produced by fossil fuels. Vietnam on the other hand doesn't show a large difference between the two methods as fossil fuels comprised of 56 percent and hydro power comprised of 44 percent of the total electricity generated.
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 89
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...s of hydro power and nuclear power only comprise of 14 and 4 percent respectively This show...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... fossil fuels Vietnam on the other hand doesnt show a large difference between the two...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29118773946 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8541875511 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.390804597701 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 261.0 22.4926829268 1160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1381.0 112.824112599 1224% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 261.0 22.9334400587 1138% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 38.0 5.23603664747 726% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174177597137 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174177597137 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128379264051 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288290246047 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 134.0 13.2329268293 1013% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -201.9 61.2550243902 -330% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 106.3 10.3012195122 1032% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.88 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.37 8.06136585366 240% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 61.0 11.4329268293 534% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 106.4 10.9970731707 968% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 61.0 11.0658536585 551% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.