The chart below
The bar chart compares the time spent for cyber-communication and games consoles by 10 to 15 age profiles on a studying day in the UK.
Overall, boys playing on games console is by far more popular than the female group, but the amount of time for chatting activity is higher among girls. Both two gender groups have a tendency of spend 4 hours plus for gaming.
It is clear that male group favors playing computer games over chatting online, with approximately 85% of boys spending 4 hours and above for that activity. By constrast, the figure for girls is just over 50%, which is lower than the the average’s.
To the left side of the picture shown, we can see that girls prefer chatting on cyberspace. Particularly, nearly 70% of the female group spends mostly all day for chatting, while time spent for online conversation by males just accounted for about 55%. Also, it is noticeable that both two sexs engage playing games specifically for more than 4 hours, which is well under 10% higher than the amount of time spent for online communication.
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 79
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 57
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 84
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... boys playing on games console is by far more popular than the female group, but ...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...s is just over 50%, which is lower than the the average’s. To the left side of the pic...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...s is just over 50%, which is lower than the the average’s. To the left side of the pic...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ceable that both two sexs engage playing games specifically for more than 4 hours...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75543478261 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71042040664 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592391304348 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9273565517 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.022655118923 0.215688989381 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0126910655048 0.103423049105 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335774031981 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0253821310096 0.15604864568 16% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043963140513 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.