The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008.
The pie charts compare the household expenditure spent for 5 catergories of activities in the UK and New Zealand over the period of 28 years, starting from 1980.
Overall, there was a small rise in proportions of utility bills in both two nations during the period shown, but the costs served for food and drink fell respectively. In 2008, UK residents spening budgets for recreation purpose rose.
It is clear that the citizens in the said countries pulled out by far more money for ulitization over 28 years, from 23% to 28% in the UK and from 27% to 31% in the New Zealand. In the contrary, the figure for those two subjects in food and drink consumption decreased slightly by full 10% in the UK and by 4% in the remaining counterpart in 2008.
From the picture above showing the UK spending in the year of 2008, we can see that recreation-related cost of these households accounted for the highest percentage of 34%, which made up approximately one third of that pie chart relatively. At the same time,the statistics standing for transport cost dropped insignificantly by only 1% in both countries, while the altogether expenditure increased marginally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-23 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | minhhh123 | view | |
| 2023-08-03 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | quan12341234 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | quan12341234 | 11 | view |
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 84
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 62
- The chart below 11
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 78
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the citizens in the said countries pulled out by far more money for ulitiza...
^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... pie chart relatively. At the same time,the statistics standing for transport cost ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87373737374 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01134219546 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626262626263 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2604593758 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.857142857 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158464549161 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688549653179 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525847727005 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0925253037114 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277081212334 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.