The bar chart compares urban population growth of three locations on the world in the 1950-2000 period and forecates by 2030.
Overall, it is clear that the growth of urban population in cities had consistently increasing trends from 1950 to 2000. Furthermore, these increasing trends are predicted to continue by 2030.
From 1950 to 2000, although African and Asian people witnessed increasing trends of urban population from roughly 10% to around 39% and from nearly 13% to 39%, respectively, these figures still were lower than those of the whole world, at precisely 30% in 1950 and nearly 48% in 2000. In contrast, the number of urban residents in Latin America was the highest figures, at 12% in 1950 and 22% in 2000.
In terms of project in 2030, while the figure of Africa is expected to grow up to 50%, that of Asia is roughly at 56%. These figures are lower than that of the world, at exactly 60%. At the same year, the percentage of urban residents in Latin America is estimated up to 80%, which is significantly higher than that of the world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72432432432 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55552796024 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524324324324 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6453798402 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151100774391 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775725409504 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630319995531 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117457552104 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640818139134 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.