The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart details the rise of urban population in different regions of the world between 1950 and 2000, with forecasts for 2030.
Overall, it is evident that the proportion of residents in all given areas is predicted to increase. In addition, Latin America and the Caribbean recorded higher population levels than other areas and are expected to remain this way in 2030.
In 1950, the rate of city population in Latin America and the Caribbean was far oustripping other cities which represented roughly 42%. While nearly 15% and 12% of the population in Asia and Africa were city dwellers, respectively. Just under a third of the population was urbanites in the whole world in 1950.
50 years later, Africa displays a threefold increase in urban population. In both these areas the city population accounted for 38% of the total. It is predicted that by 2030 the urban population will continue to grow in all areas by 10-15%, while in the whole world the percentage of urbanites is expected to be 60%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 56
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 61
- The bar graph below shows the entrolment of students in music in an Australian university from 2000 ta 2006 and the pir chart shows how they choose their career after their course 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparison where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66702719755 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552325581395 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2769894175 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119133002821 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517118628236 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315608152631 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773689165155 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290435685151 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.