In the past, people ate local food in season. Nowadays, people buy a variety of foods from all over the world. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Previously, customers consumed local food grown seasonally. Recently, global consumers have the opportunity to buy various foods grown in different places and times of the year. From my perspective, the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. The purpose of this paragraph is to discuss both views.
With the development of delivery services, food can be delivered quickly to homes. Thanks to efficient transportation, individuals have chances to taste many types of food grown in different countries. The phenomenum opens several doors for customers to improve their health conditions as a variety of nutrients and vitamins are provided to our bodies. The nutrients in local food are sometimes not sufficient to allow the body to function properly, which is why consuming imported products may help people avoid lacking essential supplements and minerals. Moreover, individuals may get opportunities to learn about a certain culture when tasting foreign dishes since many kinds of food are symbols and represent a country and its tradition.
On the other hand, this trend is also followed by several drawbacks. One of the most significant problems is environmental destruction. To improve crop quality to meet the needs of the world population, a large amount of pesticides and chemicals is used. This can lead to serious water and soil pollution. Besides, the high cost of growing and harvesting unseasonal food sometimes may make it more difficult for people to buy the products.
Generally, despite obvious disadvantages, I believe that the benefits outweigh its drawbacks
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 61
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 73
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51440329218 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05939333055 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658436213992 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3874504102 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21753114708 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059369355809 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512666519593 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110964280947 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478538455339 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51440329218 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05939333055 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658436213992 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3874504102 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21753114708 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059369355809 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512666519593 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110964280947 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478538455339 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.