The chart below gives information about the production of grains, measured in million
metric tons, from the years 2010 to 2015, with projections until 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The table details the number of million metric tons of grains that were produced over 5 years between 2010 and 2015 with a further projection for 2020, 2025 and 2030.
Focussing on the highest and the second-highest grain, wheat showed the largest quantity at 100 million metric tons (MMT). Following this, barley represented the second larger quantity at 50 MMT. Both quantities were registered in 2010. Although wheat’s production increased only 5% in 2015, barley’s production went up accounted for 70 MMT. A further projection revealed that what wheat slightly increased (110 MMT) and barley considerably went up (100 MMT) both in 2030.
Looking at the lowest and the second-lowest, rice showed only 34 MMT and 34,5 MMT in 2010 and 2015, respectively. Furthermore, rice registered 24,7 MMT and 24,3 MMT in the same period of time. What is more, both quantities slightly increased during the projected time from 2020 to 2030.
Overall, it is clear from the data that wheat and barley are the most popular grains during the recorded time as well as the projected time. In contrast, maize and rice are less popular grains.
- the diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 68
- The chart below shows the average household spending pattern for households in three income categories as a proportion of their income Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- The graph below gives information about the sales of the three most commonly purchased items in a particular bakery for the year 2014 86
- The chart below gives information about the production of grains measured in million metric tons from the years 2010 to 2015 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, second, well, in contrast, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17204301075 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8528889926 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.407961786 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108696272198 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487642254177 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420361543461 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797304271154 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350865466068 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.