Overall, at the beginning of period giving money to charity by young people higher, while the fertility of charity by seniors was less.
In general in 1990, the age 36 to 50 and the age 18 to 25 are peaks and troughs to spend money to donative between 5 age groups. The gragh shows the other age groups who fluctuate from 30% to 35%. Meanwhile, The age 51-56 was the second the rate of british people giving money to contribute at various age range. However the old age group contributed money to donation and this age group rate was about 33%
At the year 2010 the graph shows the top age group who are able to donate moneyto charity were the people at the age 51 to 65, and the same in that year, the lowest rate giving money to donation by British people was at the group 18-25. In conclusion the age groups 36-50 and 65-the old age were the same rate 35%. The last age group contributed cash to charity under 25%.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10119047619 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74170957103 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505952380952 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3379162521 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253985475658 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111036483492 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938380572148 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188933356781 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746873169239 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.