The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart illustrate as regards information of British people donating money to charity by various age groups in the years 1990 and 2010. The minimum backing to charity was granted by adults, age of 18 to 25 in both years. It represents approximately 17 percent in 1990 and about 7 percent in 2010.

Overall, the chart has the last percentage at the age of 18 to 25, the highest percentage more than 40% in 36 to 50 age group.

It was increase the age of group 36-50. The next category is 26-35, it besides was a significantly rise from around more than 30% in 1990. In 2010, the age of group 36-50. It also was a remarkable grows from over 35%. In this year increase almost 40% the figures of 51-65, but it declines percentage of old people. In 2010, the range of 51-65 more than increase 35% and under 30% in 65 age group.

In addition, two ranges that 36-50 and 65 age groups are equal in the same year, percentage of 35. The highest percentage with about 40 % and 35% in 1990. The minimum backing to charity was granted by adults, age of 18 to 25 in both years. It represents approximately 17 percent in 1990 and about 7 percent in 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 84, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
... next category is 26-35, it besides was a significantly rise from around more than 30% in 1990. In 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 185, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...10, the age of group 36-50. It also was a remarkable grows from over 35%. In this year incre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e 35% and under 30% in 65 age group. In addition, two ranges that 36-50 and 65 ...
^^
Line 8, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt in 1990 and about 7 percent in 2010.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, as regards, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39534883721 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4931619445 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0632835932 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.5 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.3571428571 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210285361645 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850057897293 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781690392439 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155290345639 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685101756663 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 13.2329268293 53% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.65 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.29 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.