The work life is an essential part of our life. We work according to our profession until we go in retirement. During this time some people work in one or a lot of organisations. The mojority of workers prefer to stay in the same organisation during their work life. But ohters have opinions that it is better to work for various institutions. I personally believe that there are some advantages and drawbacks to work for same or different organisation during the life.
First of all, in different places there are accordingly various people. If people wor in different organisations, they have opportunities to conduct convercation with a lot of workers. As a result, they can compare and contrast of characters.
Secondly, the salaries play an active role in this situation. Because worker do not get the same money in the work places. When they can not satisfy with salary, it is evident, they want to modify their work places. In this time of work changing they have, of course, some problems but it is not ongoing.
In some cases, the people work in the same organisation all the time of their life. They make so, if they have satisfaction of work.
In conclutsion, working in different organisations has more benefits than working in the same place.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting by reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... play an active role in this situation. Because worker do not get the same money in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n active role in this situation. Because worker do not get the same money in the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, of course, as a result, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87037037037 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90038075169 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7276285809 49.4020404114 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.75 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45780879934 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170802902379 0.084324248473 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131064368699 0.0667982634062 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276154229255 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14270127696 0.056905535591 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.37 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.