The chart illustrates the percentage of British people help by giving a charity in different ages during the 1990 and 2010.
According to the chart we see that those fifties and sixty fives have the same percentage in 2010 years like 35 percentages of people 51-65 aged people in 1990 years. As assimilate from fifty ones to sixty fives and only sixty fives in both years the percentage of only 65 years decrease sharply to 5%. The beginning of these figures gradually increase year by year. The situation hit a trough a low point in 2010 in spite of the percentage reached a high point.
Overall, it can be seen that there are wide variations in the percentage of people who move during certain ages.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Tamanna Champaneri
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The chart below gives the information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 to 2010 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives the information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 to 2010 56
- The internet is the most useful communication in the world
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the peoples') or simply say ''most peoples''.
Suggestion: most of the peoples; most peoples
.... The cause of the lowest rating is the most of peoples who at the age of between 18-25 are une...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73366834171 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58821777303 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422110552764 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.8786961595 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235007364776 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110270495125 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604189413611 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168584778026 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192901986031 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.