The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the year 1990 and 2010.
The chart represents the amount of money spent to charity in a percentage of different ages (18-25, 26-35, 36-50, 51-65 and over 65) in the UK from 1990 to 2010.
Overall, a small proportion of British people had given money to charity compared to who had not given any. However, it is interesting to note that, the percentage of young aged people giving money to charity in the early period was higher than that of latter period, which was mainly given by seniors.
Looking in details, the majority of money spent to charity was by younger generations; 36-50 (42%) and 26-35 (31%), while it was for lesser money spent for elders such as 51-65 people (35%) and over 65 aged people (30%) in 1990.
In contrast, by 2010, the amount of money spent on charity opposed its trend where more money had gathered from seniors than that of juniors. In 2010, seniors spent 40% and 35% to charity by 51-65 age groups and over 65 age groups respectively. Meanwhile, juniors spent the lesser money compared with the corresponding period an earlier year, at 35% for 36-50 age groups, 24% for 26-35 group. In 2010, the percentage of money spent by teenagers on charity decreased by almost one-third (7%) compared with 1990 to 17%.
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 73
- Fossil fuels are used in many countries. Other countries use alternative sources of energy, such as wind and solar power, which is encouraged. To what extent is this positive or negative development? 73
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. 78
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing population. 73
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in NZ in 2002. 78
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'look', 'third', 'while', 'as for', 'in contrast', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254032258065 0.268076937826 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.120967741935 0.116061578633 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0887096774194 0.0759168565197 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0241935483871 0.0366838410393 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0120967741935 0.0131127313244 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.16935483871 0.155750635184 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0725806451613 0.0379272487307 191% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.38287771316 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0362903225806 0.0210936926555 172% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0645161290323 0.0948980150116 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0120967741935 0.00967000014798 125% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1205.0 1161.00487805 104% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.9 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65727699531 5.90752243213 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.300469483568 0.337110787985 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.197183098592 0.247514529752 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.117370892019 0.171178102325 69% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0704225352113 0.112407865282 63% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38287771316 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50234741784 0.546246751206 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.3768423374 49.3433353143 90% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 26.625 23.0094962315 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5403603382 42.9750493124 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.625 135.714022679 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 23.0094962315 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 46.3433098592 47.7609492067 97% => OK
Elegance: 3.15384615385 2.94281807926 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482137395493 0.418131533498 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.166276366158 0.181151798455 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0536554245494 0.0850326197045 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.715010315502 0.706616315825 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185966769693 0.157042692854 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255609285356 0.228904883108 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735472926092 0.108899403657 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.309327586043 0.367819155151 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0761614727352 0.0812612215331 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332250222322 0.316326947829 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620408523148 0.0921553760075 67% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.