The bar chart gives information about the proportion of people of different ages involved in charity in year 1990 and 2010 in Britain.
Overall the percentage of middle age people were involved more charity than the younger adults in 1990 while in 2010 there were more people of age 51 to 60 participated in charity than the younger adults.
To begin with, in year 1990 approximately 16 percent of younger adults were involved in charity work and while the percentage of middle aged people participated in charity was about 40% . The percentage of people of ages between 26 and 35 was about 30 percent. The number of middle aged people involved in charity was greatest of all age groups in 1990, that was approximately 38 percent.
While in 2010, there were less number of people of ages between 18 and 25 that took part in charity work, only about 5% . The percentage of people of age group of 36-50 and people over age 65 was same, approximately 32% . And there were more people of age group from 51 to 60 participated in charity, approximately 38 percent.
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 67
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ear 1990 and 2010 in Britain. Overall the percentage of middle age people were...
^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...le participated in charity was about 40% . The percentage of people of ages betwe...
^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...took part in charity work, only about 5% . The percentage of people of age group o...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... over age 65 was same, approximately 32% . And there were more people of age group...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72580645161 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66051823313 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397849462366 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7894648805 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338978265148 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189286651793 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105969726014 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265013925818 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106321090964 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.39 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.