The graphs give information about industrial workers working hours in France, Denmark, Sweden and the UK.
It is clear from the diagrams that French workers worked least hours while Denmark and Swedish people spent the most hours to their job. However, British people spent medium time on work.
The half of French workers from industry sector worked 31-35 hours per week. While 35% and 20% of workers worked 36-40 and 46-50 hours per week respectively. The figures for the rest accounted for around 10% workers each. Seven in ten of Denmark workers worked 36-40 hours, while 22% worked 31-36 hours. The percentage of people who worked other amount of hours was around 10 percent. Sweden witnessed high proportion of people working for 36-40 hours. The percentage of people worked 31-35 and 41-45 was almost the same with around 30%. In contrast other percentages between 10 and 20. The UK had the most percentage of people who worked 50 hours. But almost 50% worked 36-40 hours per week.
- one of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should n
- Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties birthday parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money Others however think that these are necessary for individuals and the society Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76646706587 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16915289502 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48502994012 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 167.0 22.4926829268 742% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 796.0 112.824112599 706% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 167.0 22.9334400587 728% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 32.0 5.23603664747 611% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121838746535 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121838746535 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860771517934 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351665948156 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 84.5 13.2329268293 639% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -72.65 61.2550243902 -119% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.9 10.3012195122 630% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.57 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.28 8.06136585366 177% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 11.4329268293 464% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 68.8 10.9970731707 626% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 11.0658536585 479% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.