The chart below show the percentage of people in different age group who went to cinema once a month or more in one European country from 2000-2011.
The chart below shows the proportion of people in different group of age one time per month or more in Europe. The graph is divided in 4 groups of age.
As is observed from the line graph, the highest percent of people who went to cinema from one time a month is the group contain the youth from 15 to 24 years old. It increased from 18% in 2000 to 52% in 2011. The next two groups which is children between 7 and 14 years old and people in 25 to 35 years old gap. In 2000, the children group had 10% of people and the young adult group had 5% people went to the theater at least once a month. That rates considerably rise to 30% both two groups. And the last group, more than 35 years old had the lowest proportion of people went to theater from 1 time in a month. It started from 2% and slightly growth to 13% in 2011. However, in both 4 groups, there were volatile data during the rise of the percentage.
Overall, there were the uptrend from 2000 to 2011 is be seen from all 4 groups. The percent of people between 15 and 24 years old stand at the highest in contrast with the adult group whose age more than 35 years old had the lowest rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-08 | Hoang Minh | 67 | view |
- In order for the world to be a greener place punishments and fines for environmentally unfriendly acts committed by individuals need to be more severe 84
- The diagrams below show how a hybrid car works and how it is environmentally friendly 86
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In many countries people are spending more hours at their workplace Why is that Is that negative and positive development 80
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e were the uptrend from 2000 to 2011 is be seen from all 4 groups. The percent of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.06167400881 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.03012496237 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471365638767 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4278335089 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8333333333 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403906547684 0.215688989381 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154721960485 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118270974708 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300469500283 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103301079401 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 95.5 61.2550243902 156% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.27 11.4140731707 55% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.06 8.06136585366 75% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.