The chart below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie chart compares the percentage of British scholars who were able to speak languages other than English in British university in two years(2000 & 210). Overall, it is noticeable that the proportion of students who speak Spanish only, another language and two other languages significantly increased while no I her language and French only witnessed a decline.
In 2000, Spanish language is he most populous language among the British scholars which representing less than third (30%) of total population, the figure that increased steadily to 35% in 2010. In contrast, student that speak no.other language accounted for fifth of total percentage the figure that decline by half in 2010 to 10%.
Student that were able to speak another language and French only shared the same proportion 10% in 2000, the former witnessed a slight increase to fifth of total percentage while the revise was the case in later. 10% of the students speaks two languages and German only. In 2010, he number of students who hat speak two languages rise gradually to 15% while German only remain unchanged 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that the fast pace and stress of modern life is having a negative effect on families*To what extent do you agree or disagree*? 67
- The chart below show reason why people go to work by bicycle and car. 73
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025. 67
- The chart below show reason why people go to work NY bicycle or car. 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the united Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portuguese between 1976 and 2007 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11173184358 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61271227503 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3690131325 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.714285714 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364305122205 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190239454627 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806200191517 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263304686774 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893196687821 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.