The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
Leisure time in a typical week in hour- by sex and employment status, 1998-99.
The vertically stacked bar graph presents the number of hours spent per week at ease by men and women of different employment statuses from the year 1998 to 1999.
Briefly, this graph highlights that people who were unemployed or had retired from their work liked to spend much more weekly hours for their leisure. Whereas, employed people did not spend that much at ease.
Men who were working full time spent almost 45 leisure hours weekly, as against the women who were spending 7 hours lesser. Following the similar variation among both the genders, men who were retired or did not have any work spent almost equal hours at ease, about 84 per week, whereas, women spent 7 hours lesser. But, these two categories liked to spend the most on leisure in comparison to all others.
The graph does not provide the data for men who were doing part-time jobs, but women working at part-time jobs took around 40 hours per week for their leisure. While women working at their respective homes, doing the household chores got 50 hours of their schedule per week for their relief.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | cupinsiuway | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | cupinsiuway | 81 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | Siva_K | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | mrinal | 73 | view |
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your a 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge 78
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ch more weekly hours for their leisure. Whereas, employed people did not spend that muc...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...t much at ease. Men who were working full time spent almost 45 leisure hours weekly, a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78609625668 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.1314303236 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566844919786 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2888011735 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.875 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205922285446 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100710004822 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527578251315 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134474899529 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421114319993 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.