The chart below shows the amount spent six consumer goods in four European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting information, main features and make comparison wherever relevants

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the amount spent six consumer goods in four European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting information, main features and make comparison wherever relevants

The Bar shows the differences between Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain in the amount spent on consumer goods. Overall, Britain had the highest spending in every year from the bar, and Germany has the lowest average even though they just reached 2 times for the fewest spending than another country.
Generally, British expended their money the most in each qualification compare to others. The people of Britain mostly spent their money on buying photographic film and toys, which are the two largest commodities based on the data. Another same result also happened in France. They tend to spend their money on photographic films, toys, and CDs. The two latter goods are even shared similar cost that reaches a few less than £ 160,000.
Another 2 countries show a different movement, people from Pizza’s Country spent their money for consumer good in number between 144 – 158-pound sterling, and it placed them as one of the lowest averages in spending money. The same condition also happened to Germany. The people of the old Nazi’s country just used their money in number between 143 – 150-pound sterling, and it brought them as the lowest averages according to the bar charts.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-07 Wildanfars 11 view
Essays by user Wildanfars :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£160'.
Suggestion: £160
...milar cost that reaches a few less than £ 160,000. Another 2 countries show a differ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: good
... Country spent their money for consumer good in number between 144 – 158-pound sterling, and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07035175879 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46348039123 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8150403749 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.111111111 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0659011447503 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298652180599 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452999381018 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0484293606399 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182913206453 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.