The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.

Given is a bar chart providing information on the amount of money spent by four different countries on six sorts of customer products. Measures are shown in thousand pounds sterling.

A brief analysis of the figure reveals that while spending by British people was by far the highest amount on all categories, more money was spent on photographic films and toys than any other goods.

In Britain, the most significant amount of spending went on Photographic film (more than 170 million pounds); however, the UK residents were most interested in purchasing personal stereos and tennis racquets which accounted for the same amount of around 155 million pounds.

French people number one choice of buying was equal to British yet less money than spent on that (almost 160 million pounds). CDs and toys were ranked for the second shopping choice by them both at just under 160 million pounds while they placed last in perfumes and tennis racquets by around 145 million pounds.

In Italy, people spent more money on toys, which was the same as French citizens spending on this type. Besides, to other kinds of good unless photographic film their spending was approximately similar, around 140 million pounds.

Finally, Germans spent the least overall, having similar spending figures for all six products compared in the chart.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 shayma 56 view
2020-01-22 kaka singh 73 view
2020-01-21 Pham Mai Nguyet 56 view
2020-01-18 Noah1997 67 view
2020-01-18 Noah1997 67 view
Essays by user Saahaar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ustomer products. Measures are shown in thousand pounds sterling. A brief analysis of ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12442396313 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44509893077 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576036866359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1282804164 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.555555556 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141797299631 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678801367613 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727213272572 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883442690746 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631194134161 0.0819641961636 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.