The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spend chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK.

The bar chart compares the percentages of children being from 10 to 15 years old played computer games and had conversations online in the UK with three levels of spending time.
It is clear that there is larger number of children playing on games consoles than chatting on the Internet. While boys tend to play computer games, girls prefer chatting online.
Girls in the UK spent time on chatting accounted for around 68%, while the figure for boys was just under 55%. Furthermore, the amount of time that girls spent was by far higher, about 35% of those chatted online from 1 to 3 hours on an average school day, and roughly 8% of girls used over 4 hours for that. The equivalent figures for boys were around 24% and 4%.
With regard to playing on games consoles, by contrast, the proportion of boys made up to 85%, whereas the figure for girls was about 51%. It is noticeable that there are significant differences between the amounts of time. Boys spent from 1 to 3 hours to play games consoles accounted for nearly 42%, it was more three times higher than girls, and the same trend can also be seen when there are 10% of boys spent more 4 hours to play video games, only 1% of girls doing that.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-10 Daniel3003 73 view
2023-11-10 Daniel3003 78 view
2023-11-09 Daniel3003 73 view
2023-07-11 Pham Ngoc Anh 73 view
2022-08-14 Trần Khánh Nhi 78 view
Essays by user Daniel3003 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...deo games, only 1% of girls doing that.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48181818182 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26870553254 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.406558543 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30240945121 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125395383793 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087591582374 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196282831348 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678100917031 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.