The bar chart illustrates the number of films rented and sold according to four film formats.
Overall, Blu-ray and DVD sales showed an upward trend over the period. Whereas the rentals and VHS sales experienced a downward trend.
From the beginning of the period, the rentals started with the highest quantity of 200.000. Thereafter, it witnessed a gradual decline from approximately 200.000 record to 500.000 record. Meanwhile, the number of DVDs sale rose steadily from nearly 50.000 to 200.000 in 2005. Over the next year, it declined slightly until the last period with the same figure in 2005. Correlate with the rentals, VHS sales format began with 80.000 number, then it underwent a slight fall and totally disappeared in 2006. By the following year, a new film format named Blu-ray was available with a modest number of nearly 10.000. Subsequently, it grew minimally to more than 10.000 quantity by the end of the period.
It can clearly seen that in 2004 DVD sales overtook the rentals and DHS format in 2003 and 2004 by order. It finished with the same record as the rentals began with.
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales( in various formats) of film from a particular store between 2002 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The maps below show the village of stockeford in 1930 and 2010 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99462365591 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46112684247 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.7742467197 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4166666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146124452434 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601240105621 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365676625843 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995364985641 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173233237681 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.