The pie charts illustrate data on the changes in the distribution of water consumption in various fields in Sydney of Australia between 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it is clear that food production accounted for the highest amount of water, while the opposite was true for the construction area. Additionally, the figure for household intentions and manufacturing witnessed total rises throughout the observed period.
More specifically, the food industry was the greatest contributor to water usage, with a rate of roughly a half in 1997, decreasing slightly to above 40% in 2007. Meanwhile, 15% of water consumption was used for manufacturing at the beginning of the period. However, by 2007, its figure had dropped by 4%, at just over one-tenth.
Building sectors contributed the lowest figure for the total amount of water consumption, with only 5% and 2% in 1997 and 2007, respectively. In addition, despite starting at only 13% in 1997, the figure for the service industry increased significantly to a quarter, while the rate of water consumed in the household area remained its stability of around one-fifth over a decade.
- The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and a double room study area 73
- The charts show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 74
- US government expenditure on research 78
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 78
- the flow chart below show the procedure to get the driving license in US 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2817679558 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06417227572 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.408343808 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148974177278 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722762460789 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060312973118 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10491854353 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064472861856 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.