It is widely argued that novel buildings should be constructed in an old-fashioned style in remote regions. However, those opposing to this advocate that the choice of which style greatly depends on personal preference. I personally agree with the former statement. This essay will make an analysis of both points of view.
Some people are strongly holding an opinion on an old-styled building like ones in the local regions. First of all, there will be a clear structure of formation in a neighborhood since a vast majority of houses look completely similar to each other, providing visitors a scenery of cultural tradition in a particular area. This, furthermore, greatly attracts global tourism in order to witness a one-of-a-kind architectural structure, which leads to an economy boot as well as offers many job opportunities to a wide range of regional homeless dwellers. Taking Dalat as a prime example, which is one of the most well-known tourist destinations in Vietnam, has a tradition of building leaf-houses, attracting thousands of foreigners just simply to enjoy the beauty of these special buildings.
On the other hand, a large number of people commonly believe that they have the right to build their houses regarding their preferences. It is reasonably understandable that building a house strongly depends on personal options because it greatly promotes individualism involving their own hobbies and characters. With regards to a financial budget, it makes people more comfortable purchasing or construct their houses which is suitable for a decent amount of income, instead of following a specific trend.
In conclusion, it is plausible that building a house is dependent on the individual point of view, but it seems to me that a similar structure of old-fashioned houses brings many benefits in terms of economy and beauty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an old-fashioned style" with adverb for "old-fashioned"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t novel buildings should be constructed in an old-fashioned style in remote regions. However, those oppos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...pecial buildings. On the other hand, a large number of people commonly believe that they have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31632653061 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07157923708 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.766580081 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296518204414 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987917261889 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824839609581 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163963307152 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614131672968 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.