It is widely argued that novel buildings should be constructed in an old-fashioned style in remote regions. However, those opposing to this advocate that the choice of which style greatly depends on personal preference. I personally agree with the former statement. This essay will make an analysis of both points of view.
Some people are strongly holding an opinion on an old-styled building like ones in the local regions. First of all, there will be a clear structure of formation in a neighborhood since a vast majority of houses look completely similar to each other, providing visitors a scenery of cultural tradition in a particular area. This, furthermore, greatly attracts global tourism in order to witness a one-of-a-kind architectural structure, which leads to an economy boot as well as offers many job opportunities to a wide range of regional homeless dwellers. Taking Dalat as a prime example, which is one of the most well-known tourist destinations in Vietnam, has a tradition of building leaf-houses, attracting thousands of foreigners just simply to enjoy the beauty of these special buildings.
On the other hand, a large number of people commonly believe that they have the right to build their houses regarding their preferences. It is reasonably understandable that building a house strongly depends on personal options because it greatly promotes individualism involving their own hobbies and characters. With regards to a financial budget, it makes people more comfortable purchasing or construct their houses which is suitable for a decent amount of income, instead of following a specific trend.
In conclusion, it is plausible that building a house is dependent on the individual point of view, but it seems to me that a similar structure of old-fashioned houses brings many benefits in terms of economy and beauty.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 78
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.(Study Sample) 73
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in the US Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an old-fashioned style" with adverb for "old-fashioned"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t novel buildings should be constructed in an old-fashioned style in remote regions. However, those oppos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...pecial buildings. On the other hand, a large number of people commonly believe that they have ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31632653061 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07157923708 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.766580081 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296518204414 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987917261889 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824839609581 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163963307152 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614131672968 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.