The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great britain between 1961 and 2001.
Write a report summarizing the information. Select and describe the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Presenting data in percentage terms, the provided line graph depicts changes in the trends in the ownership of cars in the UK from 1961 to 2001.
Overall, the car was a much less accessible item in the 1960s than after 2000. Also, while the ratio of two or more car owners and the percentage of those who did not own the car were reversed and more gradual, the one-car trajectory was more erratic.
As for detail, nearly 65 percent of households did not have a car of their own in 1961, and none of the families owned two or more cars. The following decade saw a marked rise in one-car owners from about 35 percent to approximately 45 percent and a similar shift towards two cars in the family (ranging from 0% to just above 10%). From 1971 and onwards, the trends of no-car and one-car ownership became inversed, whereby the proportion of owners with one car continued growth, peaking at 50 percent in 1981, whereas percentage of without cars kept on decreasing to 35 percent at the same time. The trajectory of owners who had 2 cars, though, was not as substantial as it was in the previous 10 years.
During the second observation period, the established trend continued for no-car and two or more car owners, whose number became equal by 2001, amounting to 30%. However, the percentage of househols with one automobile deviated from the previous trajectory, recording a slight drop to nearly 45 percent.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past 80
- The chart gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 78
- he Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools Do you agree or disagree with this prediction 73
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71370967742 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55887681343 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552419354839 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7425470564 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111246653654 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537065329729 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436351492589 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863745021193 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387377053401 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71370967742 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55887681343 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552419354839 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7425470564 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.888888889 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111246653654 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537065329729 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436351492589 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863745021193 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387377053401 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.