Whereas the author of the reading says that these television appearance is of a great benefit to everyone, the lecture cast doubts on the main points made in the reading providing three reasons.
The reading passage and lecture are both about appearance of professors on television. This issue is illustrated by examples of benefits to professors, to universities and to public. Whereas the author of the reading says that these television appearance is of a great benefit to everyone, the lecture cast doubts on the main points made in the reading providing three reasons.
First, according to the reading, professors have benefit from appearance on TV, because they get much wider audience than in their academic community and they can share their ideas with a television audience. However, according to the lecture, being a TV celebrity professor could get reputation among fellow professors as not serious scholars.
Second, the reading states that university has benefit from appearance of their professors on TV. It leads to an improved reputation for the university, also getting more donation for the university and more applications from potential students. Nevertheless, the lecture argues that professor’s absence in university and lack of time for teaching and research became an issue because being on TV can take a lot of a professor's time.
Finally, as the reading abstract believes that general public also gets benefit from professors appearing on television. Most TV viewers have a chance to learn from exert, get a taste of real expertise and insight. But, on the other hand, the speaker explains that TV networks don’t want really serious, in-depth academic lectures. So, the material that professors really present on TV is as background on current events or some brief historical introduction.
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups However sharing personal information on social media websites does have a risk Do you think that advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live Do you agree or disagree 73
- The reading the painting cannot be attributed to Rembrandt The lecturer however suggests that painting could be created by Rembrandt 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It should be mandatory for all teenagers to take a world history class 90
- The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this television' or 'these televisions'?
Suggestion: this television; these televisions
...eas the author of the reading says that these television appearance is of a great benefit to eve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
..., as the reading abstract believes that general public also gets benefit from professors appea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, nevertheless, really, second, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35546875 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92001267104 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57421875 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4628601999 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265460861205 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119645910349 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.225169479449 0.0662205650399 340% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205093202326 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.25733173482 0.0443174109184 581% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.